A Review Of case law on mortgage slideshare
A Review Of case law on mortgage slideshare
Blog Article
These provisions use to cases where evidence was recorded after the QSO's enforcement, whether or not the transaction occurred prior to its promulgation. Read more
Article 199 of your Constitution allows High Court intervention only when "no other sufficient remedy is provided by law." It is actually well-settled that an aggrieved person must exhaust available remedies before invoking High Court jurisdiction, regardless of whether Those people remedies suit them. The doctrine of exhaustion of remedies prevents unnecessary High Court litigation. Read more
Matter:-HARASSMENT Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Const. P. 1479/2024 (S.B.) Mst. Shir Bano and another V/S Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-252214 Tag:Primarily, this is a free and democratic region, and once a person becomes a major he or she can marry whosoever he/she likes; If your parents in the boy or Female usually do not approve of this sort of inter-caste or interreligious marriage the most they're able to do if they could Reduce off social relations with the son or maybe the daughter, Nonetheless they cannot give threats or commit or instigate for acts of violence and cannot harass the person who undergoes such inter-caste or inter-religious marriage. I therefore, direct that the administration/police authorities will see, if any boy or Lady who is major undergoes inter-caste or inter-religious marriage with a woman or male that is a major, the couple is neither harassed by everyone nor subjected to threats or acts of violence and anyone who presents this sort of threats or harasses or commits acts of violence either himself or at his instigation, is taken to activity by instituting criminal proceedings because of the police against this sort of persons and further stern action is taken against these types of person(s) as provided by legislation.
This ruling has conditions, and since the petitioners failed a qualifying Test, they cannot claim equity or this Court's jurisdiction based within the Niazi case analogy. 9. In view of the above mentioned facts and circumstances on the case, petitioners have not demonstrated a case for this court's intervention under Article 199 from the Constitution. Read more
thirteen . Const. P. 209/2025 (S.B.) Saifullah Jamali (Disable) V/S Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi After arguing the matter at some duration, both parties have agreed to your disposal of the instant petition about the premise that the DIGP Malir will hear the petitioner in addition to private respondents and will consider care of all of the aspects of the case and be certain that no harassment shall be caused to both the parties.
Given that the Supreme Court is definitely the final arbitrator of all cases where the decision has been reached, therefore the decision with the Supreme Court needs to be taken care of as directed in terms of Article 187(two) of the Constitution. 10. We must dismiss these petitions because the Supreme Court has already ruled on this. Read more
All executive and judicial authorities throughout Pakistan are obligated to act in support in the Supreme Court, ensuring the enforcement of its judgments. As being the Supreme Court will be the final arbitrator of all cases where the decision has long been achieved, the decision on the Supreme Court needs to get taken care of as directed in terms of Article 187(2) on the Constitution. Read more
In federal or multi-jurisdictional law systems there may perhaps exist conflicts between the different decreased appellate courts. Sometimes these differences may not be resolved, and it may be necessary to distinguish how the regulation is applied in a single district, province, division or appellate department.
In a few jurisdictions, case legislation may be applied to ongoing adjudication; for example, criminal proceedings or family regulation.
The regulation of necessity identified and upheld by Pakistan's highest judicial body has proved an honorable protection for military adventure in civil government.it was the illegal action called legislation of necessity..
Federalism also performs a major role in determining the authority of case legislation within a particular court. Indeed, Each individual circuit has its individual set of binding case legislation. Because of this, a judgment rendered in the Ninth Circuit will not be binding during the Second Circuit but will have persuasive authority.
ten. Based over the findings of the inquiry committee, this petition just isn't considered maintainable and is particularly therefore liable to get dismissed, which is dismissed accordingly with pending application(s) if any. Read more
seventeen . Const. P. five/2024 (S.B.) Mst. Nasira Khalique Thr. Ms. Seema Khalique V/S The Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2025 SHC KHI 46 I have listened to the realized counsel for that parties and perused the record with their assistance. I intentionally not making any detail comments since the issues on the matter between the parties pending adjudication before the concerned court with regard for the interim relief application in terms of Section 7(one) of your Illegal Dispossession Act 2005 handy over possession with the subjected premises towards the petitioner; that Illegal Dispossession Case needs to be decided via the competent court after hearing the parties if pending as being the petitioner has already sought a similar prayer from the Illegal Dispossession case and so far as the restoration of possession of concerned the trial court has to see this part for interim custody of the topic premises In the event the petitioner was found forcibly evicted from the premises in question if she possessed the valid rent agreement and decision be made within two weeks from the date of receipt of this order. Read more
Matter:-SERVICE Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Writer) Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-225471 Tag:Coming on the main case, It is usually a well-set up proposition of legislation that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to achieve a finding of fact or summary. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of the fact or evidence during the Stricto-Sensu, utilize to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and conclusion obtain support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty in the charge, however, that is matter to your procedure provided under the relevant rules instead read more of otherwise, with the reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not work as appellate authority to re-recognize the evidence and to reach at its independent findings about the evidence.